{ "x402Version": 2, "id": 32512, "slug": "32512", "resource": "https://api.getplexa.com/v1/rug-check", "description": "Plexa /v1/pretrade/check — pre-trade token safety check on Base: can you still sell this token? avoid fires only on a trap proven on-chain now: no pool to exit into, an exit pot under 5% of your size, or the trading gate off (the honeypot shape). A drained pot is what a rug leaves behind — measured, not predicted. clear = no provable trap, NOT safe. Alias: same engine and price as /v1/pretrade/check.", "type": "http", "resourceType": "Monitoring", "accepts": [ { "scheme": "exact", "network": "eip155:8453", "payTo": "0xd993eAfBA87cFfa2ca2CFF5A56EF89034575A7ef", "asset": "0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913", "amount": "50000", "amountUsd": 0.05, "maxTimeoutSeconds": 300 }, { "scheme": "exact", "network": "eip155:137", "payTo": "0xd993eAfBA87cFfa2ca2CFF5A56EF89034575A7ef", "asset": "0x3c499c542cEF5E3811e1192ce70d8cC03d5c3359", "amount": "50000", "amountUsd": 0.05, "maxTimeoutSeconds": 300 }, { "scheme": "exact", "network": "eip155:42161", "payTo": "0xd993eAfBA87cFfa2ca2CFF5A56EF89034575A7ef", "asset": "0xaf88d065e77c8cC2239327C5EDb3A432268e5831", "amount": "50000", "amountUsd": 0.05, "maxTimeoutSeconds": 300 }, { "scheme": "exact", "network": "solana:5eykt4UsFv8P8NJdTREpY1vzqKqZKvdp", "payTo": "D6FqEyoFvkgGy4PpJjckHc3xRXhzL6mWQ25gz4rkVLor", "asset": "EPjFWdd5AufqSSqeM2qN1xzybapC8G4wEGGkZwyTDt1v", "amount": "50000", "amountUsd": 0.05, "maxTimeoutSeconds": 300 } ], "outputSchema": { "properties": { "example": { "properties": { "confidence": { "description": "high | medium | low. On \"avoid\" this is confidence IN THE TRIGGER, which is a measurement taken this call, so it is always \"high\" — a check that failed elsewhere does not make the measured trap less true. On \"clear\" it is how COMPLETE the checks were: fewer axes computed, lower confidence. On \"unknown\" it is capped at \"low\" by construction: the check the verdict depends on did not finish, so a high number there would contradict the verdict word next to it. Either way the gaps are reported explicitly — see `reasons` and the null fields in `risk_profile`.", "type": "string" }, "quote": { "description": "Executable quote sub-result (realizable fill under size, not mid/spot)", "type": "object" }, "reasons": { "description": "Human-readable reasons behind the verdict", "items": { "type": "string" }, "type": "array" }, "risk_profile": { "description": "Structural risk as measured DATA (age, concentration, liquidity incl. exitLiquidityUsd, oracle availability, transfer restrictions), each section with a plain-language note. Never a severity: these factors do not separate live from dead tokens [M, n=40].", "type": "object" }, "triggers": { "description": "Proven traps that fired — CLOSED list (NO_EXIT_VENUE, EXIT_LIQUIDITY_DRAINED, TRADING_DISABLED), empty when verdict is \"clear\".", "items": { "type": "string" }, "type": "array" }, "verdict": { "description": "avoid | clear | unknown. \"avoid\" = a listed trap was PROVEN at this block (see `triggers`); \"clear\" = none of them fired AND the liquidity sweep reached a conclusion; \"unknown\" = none fired but the sweep did NOT reach a conclusion (`liquidityCoverage.conclusive: false`), so absence of a trap is not established — see the `exit-coverage-incomplete:` line in `reasons`. \"clear\" is NOT a safety rating and NOT a prediction — structural risk lives in `risk_profile`. verdict semantics changed 2026-08-01 (v2): avoid = provable trap only; ok/caution are gone. 2026-08-27 (P67): a THIRD value \"unknown\" was added — it takes over the cases that used to answer \"clear\" while `liquidityCoverage.conclusive` was false. No existing value changed meaning; code branching on \"avoid\" is unaffected, and code branching on \"clear\" now gets strictly fewer, better-founded clears. 2026-09-21 (P96): a clear verdict now also requires the MEASURED sale of your position to return at least 90% of the size you asked about. Below that the answer is \"unknown\" with the reason exit-below-90pct — no trap was proven, but the exit we measured is not there at this size. Again strictly fewer clears; avoid is untouched.", "type": "string" } }, "type": "object" }, "type": { "type": "string" } }, "required": [ "type" ], "type": "object" }, "extensions": { "bazaar": { "info": { "input": { "body": { "sizeUSD": "1000", "token": "0xE014d2A4da6E450f21b5050120D291e63c8940FD" }, "bodyType": "json", "method": "POST", "type": "http" }, "output": { "example": { "confidence": "low", "coverage": { "axesExpected": 5, "axesReporting": 4 }, "liquidityCoverage": { "asOfBlock": 51728987, "asOfBlockFirst": 51728985, "conclusive": true, "factoriesChecked": 13, "poolsFound": 8, "singletonPoolsCounted": 7, "singletonPoolsHooked": 1, "singletonPoolsRejected": 22, "singletonPoolsSeen": 31, "singletonScanTruncated": true, "unmeasuredVenueNames": [], "unmeasuredVenues": 0, "venuesUnread": 0 }, "market": { "holderCount": 31524, "marketCapUsd": 2018589, "priceUsdSpot": 0.000561, "volume24hUsd": 75517.39 }, "quote": { "confidence": "low", "depthAtSize": 1763662.4571789096, "direction": "buy", "executablePrice": 1763.6624571789096 }, "reasons": [ "no provable trap detected. This is NOT a safety rating: it means none of the checks that can PROVE a trap (NO_EXIT_VENUE, EXIT_LIQUIDITY_DRAINED, TRADING_DISABLED) fired at this block, AND the liquidity sweep reached a conclusion (liquidityCoverage.conclusive). Structural risk — age, holder concentration, liquidity depth, transfer restrictions — is reported in risk_profile and can still be severe", "hook-refused-quote — a Uniswap v4 pool whose hook has swap permissions rejected our quoter's simulation of the sale (a third-party quote), so that sale was not measured this call; no sale through that pool was observed in blocks 51426586–51728985, at most 7 days — see observedExit", "not checked: independent price cross-check (a Chainlink feed, or a second venue pricing the same pair) — no Chainlink feed and no on-chain price on the 12 priced venue(s) of base. Reported as unknown, never as clean; confidence reduced accordingly", "route-search-skipped:direct-exit-sufficient — the first hop already cleared the floor, so we did NOT enumerate exotic roads for this token: a better road may exist and was not looked for" ], "risk_profile": { "age": { "ageDays": 455.03, "genesisBlock": 32071499 }, "concentration": { "ageSec": null, "poolsExclusion": "applied", "source": "graph", "stale": false, "top10Bound": "lower", "top10SharePct": 88.0185, "top10SharePctInclPools": 90.0863, "top1SharePct": 64.0204 }, "liquidity": { "exitLiquidityUsd": 977.2, "exitPoolInventoryUsd": 116037.32, "exitPotBasis": "position-sale", "poolCount": 8, "venueCount": 1 }, "oracle": { "deviationBps": null, "source": null }, "transferability": { "fingerprints": "none", "hasBlacklist": false, "tradingEnabled": null } }, "sources": { "*": "measured", "market": "vendor:dexscreener+goplus", "market.holderCount": "vendor:goplus", "risk_profile.concentration": "vendor:graph" }, "triggers": [], "ts": 1790247323121, "validUntil": 1790247326121, "verdict": "clear" }, "type": "json" } }, "schema": { "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema", "properties": { "input": { "additionalProperties": false, "properties": { "body": { "additionalProperties": false, "examples": [ { "sizeUSD": "1000", "token": "0xE014d2A4da6E450f21b5050120D291e63c8940FD" } ], "properties": { "chain": { "description": "Optional, default \"base\". One of: base | polygon | matic | arbitrum | arbitrum-one | arb | eip155:8453 | eip155:137 | eip155:42161 — case-sensitive (see `enum`). The safety flags are Base-tuned, so a non-base value currently answers 422 rather than returning Base-calibrated flags for another chain.", "enum": [ "base", "polygon", "matic", "arbitrum", "arbitrum-one", "arb", "eip155:8453", "eip155:137", "eip155:42161" ], "type": "string" }, "sizeUSD": { "description": "Optional USD notional for the executable-quote sub-result, default \"1000\". A STRING, not a number; positive, no thousands separator (\"1,000\" is rejected) — see `pattern`.", "maxLength": 78, "pattern": "^(?:0\\.\\d*[1-9]\\d*|[1-9]\\d*(?:\\.\\d+)?)$", "type": "string" }, "token": { "description": "ERC-20 to vet before buying. 0x + 40 hex (see `pattern`) — a symbol like \"WETH\" is rejected with 400.", "pattern": "^0x[0-9a-fA-F]{40}$", "type": "string" } }, "required": [ "token" ], "type": "object" }, "bodyType": { "enum": [ "json", "form-data", "text" ], "type": "string" }, "method": { "enum": [ "POST" ], "type": "string" }, "type": { "const": "http", "type": "string" } }, "required": [ "type", "method", "bodyType", "body" ], "type": "object" }, "output": { "properties": { "example": { "properties": { "confidence": { "description": "high | medium | low. On \"avoid\" this is confidence IN THE TRIGGER, which is a measurement taken this call, so it is always \"high\" — a check that failed elsewhere does not make the measured trap less true. On \"clear\" it is how COMPLETE the checks were: fewer axes computed, lower confidence. On \"unknown\" it is capped at \"low\" by construction: the check the verdict depends on did not finish, so a high number there would contradict the verdict word next to it. Either way the gaps are reported explicitly — see `reasons` and the null fields in `risk_profile`.", "type": "string" }, "quote": { "description": "Executable quote sub-result (realizable fill under size, not mid/spot)", "type": "object" }, "reasons": { "description": "Human-readable reasons behind the verdict", "items": { "type": "string" }, "type": "array" }, "risk_profile": { "description": "Structural risk as measured DATA (age, concentration, liquidity incl. exitLiquidityUsd, oracle availability, transfer restrictions), each section with a plain-language note. Never a severity: these factors do not separate live from dead tokens [M, n=40].", "type": "object" }, "triggers": { "description": "Proven traps that fired — CLOSED list (NO_EXIT_VENUE, EXIT_LIQUIDITY_DRAINED, TRADING_DISABLED), empty when verdict is \"clear\".", "items": { "type": "string" }, "type": "array" }, "verdict": { "description": "avoid | clear | unknown. \"avoid\" = a listed trap was PROVEN at this block (see `triggers`); \"clear\" = none of them fired AND the liquidity sweep reached a conclusion; \"unknown\" = none fired but the sweep did NOT reach a conclusion (`liquidityCoverage.conclusive: false`), so absence of a trap is not established — see the `exit-coverage-incomplete:` line in `reasons`. \"clear\" is NOT a safety rating and NOT a prediction — structural risk lives in `risk_profile`. verdict semantics changed 2026-08-01 (v2): avoid = provable trap only; ok/caution are gone. 2026-08-27 (P67): a THIRD value \"unknown\" was added — it takes over the cases that used to answer \"clear\" while `liquidityCoverage.conclusive` was false. No existing value changed meaning; code branching on \"avoid\" is unaffected, and code branching on \"clear\" now gets strictly fewer, better-founded clears. 2026-09-21 (P96): a clear verdict now also requires the MEASURED sale of your position to return at least 90% of the size you asked about. Below that the answer is \"unknown\" with the reason exit-below-90pct — no trap was proven, but the exit we measured is not there at this size. Again strictly fewer clears; avoid is untouched.", "type": "string" } }, "type": "object" }, "type": { "type": "string" } }, "required": [ "type" ], "type": "object" } }, "required": [ "input" ], "type": "object" } }, "builder-code": { "info": { "a": "bc_g9x4yzn7" }, "schema": { "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema", "additionalProperties": false, "properties": { "a": { "description": "App builder code", "pattern": "^[a-z0-9_]{1,32}$", "type": "string" }, "s": { "description": "Service builder codes", "items": { "pattern": "^[a-z0-9_]{1,32}$", "type": "string" }, "type": "array" }, "w": { "description": "Wallet builder code", "pattern": "^[a-z0-9_]{1,32}$", "type": "string" } }, "type": "object" } } }, "tags": [ "bazaar", "builder-code" ], "sourceHost": "api.getplexa.com", "lastUpdated": "2026-10-08T05:34:43.838Z", "quality": { "calls30d": 2, "uniquePayers30d": 2, "lastCalledAt": "2026-10-08T05:34:43.317Z" }, "metadata": { "extensions": { "bazaar": { "info": { "input": { "body": { "sizeUSD": "1000", "token": "0xE014d2A4da6E450f21b5050120D291e63c8940FD" }, "bodyType": "json", "method": "POST", "type": "http" }, "output": { "example": { "confidence": "low", "coverage": { "axesExpected": 5, "axesReporting": 4 }, "liquidityCoverage": { "asOfBlock": 51728987, "asOfBlockFirst": 51728985, "conclusive": true, "factoriesChecked": 13, "poolsFound": 8, "singletonPoolsCounted": 7, "singletonPoolsHooked": 1, "singletonPoolsRejected": 22, "singletonPoolsSeen": 31, "singletonScanTruncated": true, "unmeasuredVenueNames": [], "unmeasuredVenues": 0, "venuesUnread": 0 }, "market": { "holderCount": 31524, "marketCapUsd": 2018589, "priceUsdSpot": 0.000561, "volume24hUsd": 75517.39 }, "quote": { "confidence": "low", "depthAtSize": 1763662.4571789096, "direction": "buy", "executablePrice": 1763.6624571789096 }, "reasons": [ "no provable trap detected. This is NOT a safety rating: it means none of the checks that can PROVE a trap (NO_EXIT_VENUE, EXIT_LIQUIDITY_DRAINED, TRADING_DISABLED) fired at this block, AND the liquidity sweep reached a conclusion (liquidityCoverage.conclusive). Structural risk — age, holder concentration, liquidity depth, transfer restrictions — is reported in risk_profile and can still be severe", "hook-refused-quote — a Uniswap v4 pool whose hook has swap permissions rejected our quoter's simulation of the sale (a third-party quote), so that sale was not measured this call; no sale through that pool was observed in blocks 51426586–51728985, at most 7 days — see observedExit", "not checked: independent price cross-check (a Chainlink feed, or a second venue pricing the same pair) — no Chainlink feed and no on-chain price on the 12 priced venue(s) of base. Reported as unknown, never as clean; confidence reduced accordingly", "route-search-skipped:direct-exit-sufficient — the first hop already cleared the floor, so we did NOT enumerate exotic roads for this token: a better road may exist and was not looked for" ], "risk_profile": { "age": { "ageDays": 455.03, "genesisBlock": 32071499 }, "concentration": { "ageSec": null, "poolsExclusion": "applied", "source": "graph", "stale": false, "top10Bound": "lower", "top10SharePct": 88.0185, "top10SharePctInclPools": 90.0863, "top1SharePct": 64.0204 }, "liquidity": { "exitLiquidityUsd": 977.2, "exitPoolInventoryUsd": 116037.32, "exitPotBasis": "position-sale", "poolCount": 8, "venueCount": 1 }, "oracle": { "deviationBps": null, "source": null }, "transferability": { "fingerprints": "none", "hasBlacklist": false, "tradingEnabled": null } }, "sources": { "*": "measured", "market": "vendor:dexscreener+goplus", "market.holderCount": "vendor:goplus", "risk_profile.concentration": "vendor:graph" }, "triggers": [], "ts": 1790247323121, "validUntil": 1790247326121, "verdict": "clear" }, "type": "json" } }, "schema": { "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema", "properties": { "input": { "additionalProperties": false, "properties": { "body": { "additionalProperties": false, "examples": [ { "sizeUSD": "1000", "token": "0xE014d2A4da6E450f21b5050120D291e63c8940FD" } ], "properties": { "chain": { "description": "Optional, default \"base\". One of: base | polygon | matic | arbitrum | arbitrum-one | arb | eip155:8453 | eip155:137 | eip155:42161 — case-sensitive (see `enum`). The safety flags are Base-tuned, so a non-base value currently answers 422 rather than returning Base-calibrated flags for another chain.", "enum": [ "base", "polygon", "matic", "arbitrum", "arbitrum-one", "arb", "eip155:8453", "eip155:137", "eip155:42161" ], "type": "string" }, "sizeUSD": { "description": "Optional USD notional for the executable-quote sub-result, default \"1000\". A STRING, not a number; positive, no thousands separator (\"1,000\" is rejected) — see `pattern`.", "maxLength": 78, "pattern": "^(?:0\\.\\d*[1-9]\\d*|[1-9]\\d*(?:\\.\\d+)?)$", "type": "string" }, "token": { "description": "ERC-20 to vet before buying. 0x + 40 hex (see `pattern`) — a symbol like \"WETH\" is rejected with 400.", "pattern": "^0x[0-9a-fA-F]{40}$", "type": "string" } }, "required": [ "token" ], "type": "object" }, "bodyType": { "enum": [ "json", "form-data", "text" ], "type": "string" }, "method": { "enum": [ "POST" ], "type": "string" }, "type": { "const": "http", "type": "string" } }, "required": [ "type", "method", "bodyType", "body" ], "type": "object" }, "output": { "properties": { "example": { "properties": { "confidence": { "description": "high | medium | low. On \"avoid\" this is confidence IN THE TRIGGER, which is a measurement taken this call, so it is always \"high\" — a check that failed elsewhere does not make the measured trap less true. On \"clear\" it is how COMPLETE the checks were: fewer axes computed, lower confidence. On \"unknown\" it is capped at \"low\" by construction: the check the verdict depends on did not finish, so a high number there would contradict the verdict word next to it. Either way the gaps are reported explicitly — see `reasons` and the null fields in `risk_profile`.", "type": "string" }, "quote": { "description": "Executable quote sub-result (realizable fill under size, not mid/spot)", "type": "object" }, "reasons": { "description": "Human-readable reasons behind the verdict", "items": { "type": "string" }, "type": "array" }, "risk_profile": { "description": "Structural risk as measured DATA (age, concentration, liquidity incl. exitLiquidityUsd, oracle availability, transfer restrictions), each section with a plain-language note. Never a severity: these factors do not separate live from dead tokens [M, n=40].", "type": "object" }, "triggers": { "description": "Proven traps that fired — CLOSED list (NO_EXIT_VENUE, EXIT_LIQUIDITY_DRAINED, TRADING_DISABLED), empty when verdict is \"clear\".", "items": { "type": "string" }, "type": "array" }, "verdict": { "description": "avoid | clear | unknown. \"avoid\" = a listed trap was PROVEN at this block (see `triggers`); \"clear\" = none of them fired AND the liquidity sweep reached a conclusion; \"unknown\" = none fired but the sweep did NOT reach a conclusion (`liquidityCoverage.conclusive: false`), so absence of a trap is not established — see the `exit-coverage-incomplete:` line in `reasons`. \"clear\" is NOT a safety rating and NOT a prediction — structural risk lives in `risk_profile`. verdict semantics changed 2026-08-01 (v2): avoid = provable trap only; ok/caution are gone. 2026-08-27 (P67): a THIRD value \"unknown\" was added — it takes over the cases that used to answer \"clear\" while `liquidityCoverage.conclusive` was false. No existing value changed meaning; code branching on \"avoid\" is unaffected, and code branching on \"clear\" now gets strictly fewer, better-founded clears. 2026-09-21 (P96): a clear verdict now also requires the MEASURED sale of your position to return at least 90% of the size you asked about. Below that the answer is \"unknown\" with the reason exit-below-90pct — no trap was proven, but the exit we measured is not there at this size. Again strictly fewer clears; avoid is untouched.", "type": "string" } }, "type": "object" }, "type": { "type": "string" } }, "required": [ "type" ], "type": "object" } }, "required": [ "input" ], "type": "object" } }, "builder-code": { "info": { "a": "bc_g9x4yzn7" }, "schema": { "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema", "additionalProperties": false, "properties": { "a": { "description": "App builder code", "pattern": "^[a-z0-9_]{1,32}$", "type": "string" }, "s": { "description": "Service builder codes", "items": { "pattern": "^[a-z0-9_]{1,32}$", "type": "string" }, "type": "array" }, "w": { "description": "Wallet builder code", "pattern": "^[a-z0-9_]{1,32}$", "type": "string" } }, "type": "object" } } } }, "liveness": { "reliability": null }, "verified": false, "featured": false, "provider": { "host": "api.getplexa.com", "manifest_name": "api.getplexa.com", "source": "cdp-mirror", "source_manifest_url": "https://api.cdp.coinbase.com/platform/v2/x402/discovery/resources", "submitted_at": "2026-10-14T01:15:01.050Z" }, "exampleResponse": { "example": { "confidence": "string", "quote": {}, "reasons": [ "string" ], "risk_profile": {}, "triggers": [ "string" ], "verdict": "string" }, "type": "string" } }