Plexa /v1/pretrade/check — pre-trade token safety check on Base: can you still sell thi…

[
  {
    "scheme": "exact",
    "network": "eip155:8453",
    "payTo": "0xd993eAfBA87cFfa2ca2CFF5A56EF89034575A7ef",
    "asset": "0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913",
    "amount": "50000",
    "amountUsd": 0.05,
    "maxTimeoutSeconds": 300
  },
  {
    "scheme": "exact",
    "network": "eip155:137",
    "payTo": "0xd993eAfBA87cFfa2ca2CFF5A56EF89034575A7ef",
    "asset": "0x3c499c542cEF5E3811e1192ce70d8cC03d5c3359",
    "amount": "50000",
    "amountUsd": 0.05,
    "maxTimeoutSeconds": 300
  },
  {
    "scheme": "exact",
    "network": "eip155:42161",
    "payTo": "0xd993eAfBA87cFfa2ca2CFF5A56EF89034575A7ef",
    "asset": "0xaf88d065e77c8cC2239327C5EDb3A432268e5831",
    "amount": "50000",
    "amountUsd": 0.05,
    "maxTimeoutSeconds": 300
  },
  {
    "scheme": "exact",
    "network": "solana:5eykt4UsFv8P8NJdTREpY1vzqKqZKvdp",
    "payTo": "D6FqEyoFvkgGy4PpJjckHc3xRXhzL6mWQ25gz4rkVLor",
    "asset": "EPjFWdd5AufqSSqeM2qN1xzybapC8G4wEGGkZwyTDt1v",
    "amount": "50000",
    "amountUsd": 0.05,
    "maxTimeoutSeconds": 300
  }
]

{
  "properties": {
    "example": {
      "properties": {
        "confidence": {
          "description": "high | medium | low. On \"avoid\" this is confidence IN THE TRIGGER, which is a measurement taken this call, so it is always \"high\" — a check that failed elsewhere does not make the measured trap less true. On \"clear\" it is how COMPLETE the checks were: fewer axes computed, lower confidence. On \"unknown\" it is capped at \"low\" by construction: the check the verdict depends on did not finish, so a high number there would contradict the verdict word next to it. Either way the gaps are reported explicitly — see `reasons` and the null fields in `risk_profile`.",
          "type": "string"
        },
        "quote": {
          "description": "Executable quote sub-result (realizable fill under size, not mid/spot)",
          "type": "object"
        },
        "reasons": {
          "description": "Human-readable reasons behind the verdict",
          "items": {
            "type": "string"
          },
          "type": "array"
        },
        "risk_profile": {
          "description": "Structural risk as measured DATA (age, concentration, liquidity incl. exitLiquidityUsd, oracle availability, transfer restrictions), each section with a plain-language note. Never a severity: these factors do not separate live from dead tokens [M, n=40].",
          "type": "object"
        },
        "triggers": {
          "description": "Proven traps that fired — CLOSED list (NO_EXIT_VENUE, EXIT_LIQUIDITY_DRAINED, TRADING_DISABLED), empty when verdict is \"clear\".",
          "items": {
            "type": "string"
          },
          "type": "array"
        },
        "verdict": {
          "description": "avoid | clear | unknown. \"avoid\" = a listed trap was PROVEN at this block (see `triggers`); \"clear\" = none of them fired AND the liquidity sweep reached a conclusion; \"unknown\" = none fired but the sweep did NOT reach a conclusion (`liquidityCoverage.conclusive: false`), so absence of a trap is not established — see the `exit-coverage-incomplete:<what>` line in `reasons`. \"clear\" is NOT a safety rating and NOT a prediction — structural risk lives in `risk_profile`. verdict semantics changed 2026-08-01 (v2): avoid = provable trap only; ok/caution are gone. 2026-08-27 (P67): a THIRD value \"unknown\" was added — it takes over the cases that used to answer \"clear\" while `liquidityCoverage.conclusive` was false. No existing value changed meaning; code branching on \"avoid\" is unaffected, and code branching on \"clear\" now gets strictly fewer, better-founded clears. 2026-09-21 (P96): a clear verdict now also requires the MEASURED sale of your position to return at least 90% of the size you asked about. Below that the answer is \"unknown\" with the reason exit-below-90pct — no trap was proven, but the exit we measured is not there at this size. Again strictly fewer clears; avoid is untouched.",
          "type": "string"
        }
      },
      "type": "object"
    },
    "type": {
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "type"
  ],
  "type": "object"
}

{
  "example": {
    "confidence": "string",
    "quote": {},
    "reasons": [
      "string"
    ],
    "risk_profile": {},
    "triggers": [
      "string"
    ],
    "verdict": "string"
  },
  "type": "string"
}